adjacent-overload-signatures
Require that function overload signatures be consecutive.
✅
Extending "plugin:@typescript-eslint/recommended"
in an ESLint configuration enables this rule.
Function overload signatures represent multiple ways a function can be called, potentially with different return types. It's typical for an interface or type alias describing a function to place all overload signatures next to each other. If Signatures placed elsewhere in the type are easier to be missed by future developers reading the code.
.eslintrc.cjs
module.exports = {
"rules": {
"@typescript-eslint/adjacent-overload-signatures": "error"
}
};
Examples
- ❌ Incorrect
- ✅ Correct
declare namespace Foo {
export function foo(s: string): void;
export function foo(n: number): void;
export function bar(): void;
export function foo(sn: string | number): void;
}
type Foo = {
foo(s: string): void;
foo(n: number): void;
bar(): void;
foo(sn: string | number): void;
};
interface Foo {
foo(s: string): void;
foo(n: number): void;
bar(): void;
foo(sn: string | number): void;
}
class Foo {
foo(s: string): void;
foo(n: number): void;
bar(): void {}
foo(sn: string | number): void {}
}
export function foo(s: string): void;
export function foo(n: number): void;
export function bar(): void;
export function foo(sn: string | number): void;
declare namespace Foo {
export function foo(s: string): void;
export function foo(n: number): void;
export function foo(sn: string | number): void;
export function bar(): void;
}
type Foo = {
foo(s: string): void;
foo(n: number): void;
foo(sn: string | number): void;
bar(): void;
};
interface Foo {
foo(s: string): void;
foo(n: number): void;
foo(sn: string | number): void;
bar(): void;
}
class Foo {
foo(s: string): void;
foo(n: number): void;
foo(sn: string | number): void {}
bar(): void {}
}
export function bar(): void;
export function foo(s: string): void;
export function foo(n: number): void;
export function foo(sn: string | number): void;
This rule is not configurable.
Options
When Not To Use It
If you don't care about the general structure of the code, then you will not need this rule.